You would not be able to get away with racial epithets on private property, therefore, would be breaching an agreement, and would most likely be kicked out. People already have ways of mitigating this, voluntarily. All the NAP is, is making those specific laws a priority for any governing body. There is nothing stopping you from being the opposite, either, so long as it doesn't escalate to force, or threats of force. Just like, right now, there is nothing stopping that, either. There is nothing stopping individuals from building rapport, and being nice to one another. So that is how i connect this with bigotry You seem to have it in your mind, that the concept of the golden rule is antithetical to the NAP. Just wanted to say you don't have to care about that person's opinion. Understandable, to be honest, I've done that to often as well. True just clearing fake news i guess since i hate fake news You don't have to reply to some asshole's alt, you know. We got no social welfare here in the philippines Ive work for 8 years before being defeated by schizophrenia completely you gotta walk the walk before you talk the talk or however it goes. He is just dead weight, an obese parasite.Ĭlearly not in the position to critize the rich for calling him lazy or him saying ''ah the classic rich saying the poor are lazy'' some people never reproduce but they at least help the community or help their family. He has no useful hobby, does no voluntary social or utilitary work, virgin at 30 years of age and not because of religious or moral chocies and will probably never reproduce and maybe that's fine. He really isn't in the position to hate on the rich for being parasites and other stuff, the guy never worked a day in his life and is fed by the government, people pay taxes to maintain him alive with a house, electricity, internet, healthcare and enough food to reach obesity and we all know also by his own admission that he is pretty much an useless investment for the state. KittenCuddler Hating on rich parasites is good, not bigoted
Its clear non aggression principle allows being rude/hate speech/bigotry and i find that dangerous with how real life goes Im criticizing that its too idealistic and not realistic at all when i already said to you many times the golden rule applies and heck even escalation or vicious cycle applies in real life Ye you define non aggression principle clearly as no aggression at all or else self defense is allowed You brought that up out of nowhere, and I already established that what I am doing is not in violation of the NAP, so I don't see any reason to dwell on this topic anymore. Yeah, Wikipedia has it on there, but I don't see how this has anything to do with anything, since I already told you what it was.īesides, this thread was about bigotry anyway, not the NAP. I am telling you, clear as day, that this is what it is, and you are applying things that do not constitute acts of aggression, towards the definition. I provided you with the definition most commonly used, by people who advocate for it. Wikipedia has the basics of non aggression principle for all to read including some criticisms for it
0 kommentar(er)
